Blog Archive

Friday, 13 October 2017

Holy Utility

Why is it that our human race has so contentedly marched forward with the yoke of theology hung about its neck, for all intents and purposes like some communal albatross? In all other human relationships some manner of equality is the ideal that we aim for, a zero sum game in which both parties come away from it satisfied. We appear to have chosen that this principle need not be adhered to in the Religion Game.

When one cracks the nut of religion, what constitutes the meat within? What is it that we want from our gods (of which we’ve had a plethora across our literate ages and, no doubt, some “plethora to the n-th power” across all of the pre-literate æons of our existence)? Do we request our divinities to provide an extension for our egos? This is but a particular wording for our desire for a so-called “afterlife,” and what is an afterlife but a means of denying the existence of death? We find the concept of the dissolution of our egos to be distasteful at the very least, so we choose to deny death its due by choosing to believe that our egos shall carry on unperturbed, even though the form of its future container remains an unknown. But do these overtime periods of our lives require the intervention of a superhuman entity? No. So what is it that we desire of our gods? In fact, what do we want of our gods so badly that we have chosen over the ages to bribe entities (of which we possess no objective, empirical knowledge whatsoever) with gifts that the gods do not need and the sacrifice of which (by some means guaranteed to render any given sacrifice useless to the person making the offering) only serves to impoverish the believer. Let’s take just one instance as a class-action example: a shepherd wishes to please the theoretical entity of his/her choice by making a burnt offering of a newly born lamb. The lamb is killed and then its corpse is burned (there may be special instructions for conducting this voluntary descent down the ladder of economic well-being but they are irrelevant to the principle of the process). Has the shepherd now satisfied the hunger of the supernatural recipient of the sacrifice? Has the Being been saved from death by starvation? Does the family of the shepherd now have less to eat? The answers are: No, No & Yes.
Humans who dispose of the profits of their labour in a more-or-less voluntary manner, either directly or through individuals who have specialised in acting as the A&R personnel of some specific Higher Being, are in point of fact attempting to get a service of some kind from one or another of these Beings. Letting any and all activities having to do with the state of a human ego after the demise and decomposition of its original fleshy vessel slide, one is left with nothing to desire of one’s god(s) except protection from the ills, ill wills of others and the multitude of accidents that any person may experience during the course of their life. 
If you spend some time paying attention to the events that happen all around you, by using the data source(s) of your choice, you will very quickly realise that Higher Beings are not spending much of Their time or effort protecting anybody from anything. No matter how thick the pillars of smoke may be from the would-be bribers of gods, or how loud the chants, how numerous the prayers of the faithful, life goes on just as it always has: day by day, chance by chance, and with no Shielding From Above over anyone anywhere from the ubiquitous arrows of Chaos. Chaos is not another direction to turn to if you are still looking for the Why of it all, because Chaos does not have even a walk-on silent rôle in the play (or interplay) of Life. Chaos just hangs around and, when so inclined, it will fuck shit up. 

So save your sheep. Or eat ‘em. Or whatever. 

Movies and Manhood

This: of all of the films that end with me in tears, I am fairly certain that according to how our society views males, I cry during the wrong ones. There is still, in fact, a sizeable percentage of the Western population that believes that males don’t have the right to express their feelings at all. They may well feel that way but they don’t realise that the only emotional outlet that they have left for those men is psychosis. 
My apologies to the Western world but, I would rather shed a tear than become a sociopath.…

Tuesday, 26 September 2017

Irony In The Fire

What a jest,
That the love who
Left and left 
You dismembered, 
Should be the one 
That you remember 
Best.

Sunday, 24 September 2017

The Limits of Genius

Leonardo Da Vinci's notebooks show that he predicted many inventions long before they came to be but, the parking ticket wasn't one of them.

So She Shines


Her face, her eyes:
The perfect disguise 
For a soul so bright
I could see her at night 
With no moon or stars 
Dripping light.

Saturday, 23 September 2017

Anticipation

In dreams, you feel and find
My touch as fine as 
A spider's line. 
Both thrill and fear, 
You know I'm near and 
Quiver as I bide my time…

Friday, 22 September 2017

Questions, Questions, Questions


I woke up today filled with a powerful sense of self-loathing. I realised that buying anything is disgusting and wasteful unless one has a plan for living forever. Why must we be born at all if we are here for only a moment? Evolution is a trick, a clever illusion that makes life seem to make sense by covering up the real questions with an appearance of order and inevitability that causes a response in us, the observers, of something like, "Aah, yes! Of COURSE!!" We get so dazzled that we forget what we came to ask in the first place: why is there any life at all? Here the creationists have the edge since their view of the question allows them to answer that "why" with a self-consistent "because." They have no need to go any deeper into it because only a fool would claim to know the mind of God. But science leaves us with a Chinese box-puzzle that offers up a new question right after we have solved the previous one and there are those who thought that we had just reached the end of the chain and now we knew it all. No. That was a delusion and only a temporary one at that. Science offers no Final Solutions, no end to the flow of inquiry. In large part this may be because science is unable to give us a beginning, either. It is no surprise to me that there are scientists who possess a deep religious faith of some kind: since their calling has no chance of ever being perfected to the point where it can answer the "why" questions that bracket our existence, it is only natural that the human who is a scientist would also want to have a measure of peace. Since Creation and science are not mutually exclusive, you can have your peace and pick away at it on weekdays as well.

Translate

Followers